For convenience sake: How should it appear?

\nFor heavens Grammar stake, wherefore didnt somebody discipline how to spell and punctuation this behavior to some redeemrs? Probably because its one of those rules in flux. \n\n near relievers learned that any while a possessive is used, an apostrophe is needed. As the expression shows that saki belongs to whatchamacallit, it ought to be spelled/punctuated for conveniences pastime, near? \n\nNot exactly. The use of sake allows for two exceptions to the above rule. First, if the interchange coming before sake ends in an ss, just about speakers would point out it difficult to advance aloud, and it reliable would look darn noisome on the page or screen, so the s is dropped. Hence, we write for goodness sake and non for goodnesss sake. Secondly, if the script coming before sake is more than a pair off of syllables long and ends in ce, most speakers likewise find it feckless to say and so the s is dispensed with. Hence, we write for convenience sake. In all early(a) cases such as for Petes sake or for graven images sake let in the s. \n\nOf course, not all speakers (and thereof readers) find adding that s specially difficult to say. So they say it. And then some authors write it. Ultimately, this is one of those grammatical rules in flux, and increasingly dictionaries and grammar guidebooks are allowing for both spelling/punctuation as acceptable, standard English. \n\nAs a writer, you rotter avoid the upshot by revising the parlance to for the sake of convenience. Otherwise, stick to the master key rule of no s or whatever the mood guide of your publishing place advises.\n\nNeed an editor? Having your book, melodic phrase document or donnish paper proofread or edited before submitting it canister prove invaluable. In an scotch climate where you face heavier-than-air competition, your writing needs a second eye to defy you the edge. Whether you come from a handsome city like Atlanta, Georgia, or a small townsfolk like Atlan ta, Idaho, I can provide that second eye.